PEP 200 – Python 2.0 Release Schedule
- Python 2.0 Release Schedule
- Jeremy Hylton <jeremy at alum.mit.edu>
- Release Schedule
- Previous milestones
- What is release candidate 1?
- Guidelines for submitting patches and making changes
- Failing test cases need to get fixed
- Open items – Need to be resolved before 2.0 final release
- Accepted and in progress
- Open: proposed but not accepted or rejected
- Previously failing test cases
- Open items – completed/fixed
- Accepted and completed
This PEP describes the Python 2.0 release schedule, tracking the status and ownership of the major new features, summarizes discussions held in mailing list forums, and provides URLs for further information, patches, and other outstanding issues. The CVS revision history of this file contains the definitive historical record.
[revised 5 Oct 2000]
- 26-Sep-2000: 2.0 beta 2
- 9-Oct-2000: 2.0 release candidate 1 (2.0c1)
- 16-Oct-2000: 2.0 final
- 14-Aug-2000: All 2.0 PEPs finished / feature freeze
- 5-Sep-2000: 2.0 beta 1
What is release candidate 1?
We believe that release candidate 1 will fix all known bugs that we intend to fix for the 2.0 final release. This release should be a bit more stable than the previous betas. We would like to see even more widespread testing before the final release, so we are producing this release candidate. The final release will be exactly the same unless any show-stopping (or brown bag) bugs are found by testers of the release candidate.
Guidelines for submitting patches and making changes
Use good sense when committing changes. You should know what we mean by good sense or we wouldn’t have given you commit privileges <0.5 wink>. Some specific examples of good sense include:
- Do whatever the dictator tells you.
- Discuss any controversial changes on python-dev first. If you get a lot of +1 votes and no -1 votes, make the change. If you get a some -1 votes, think twice; consider asking Guido what he thinks.
- If the change is to code you contributed, it probably makes sense for you to fix it.
- If the change affects code someone else wrote, it probably makes sense to ask him or her first.
- You can use the SF Patch Manager to submit a patch and assign it to someone for review.
Any significant new feature must be described in a PEP and approved before it is checked in.
Any significant code addition, such as a new module or large patch, must include test cases for the regression test and documentation. A patch should not be checked in until the tests and documentation are ready.
If you fix a bug, you should write a test case that would have caught the bug.
If you commit a patch from the SF Patch Manager or fix a bug from the Jitterbug database, be sure to reference the patch/bug number in the CVS log message. Also be sure to change the status in the patch manager or bug database (if you have access to the bug database).
It is not acceptable for any checked in code to cause the regression test to fail. If a checkin causes a failure, it must be fixed within 24 hours or it will be backed out.
All contributed C code must be ANSI C. If possible check it with two different compilers, e.g. gcc and MSVC.
All contributed Python code must follow Guido’s Python style guide. http://www.python.org/doc/essays/styleguide.html
It is understood that any code contributed will be released under an Open Source license. Do not contribute code if it can’t be released this way.
Failing test cases need to get fixed
We need to resolve errors in the regression test suite quickly. Changes should not be committed to the CVS tree unless the regression test runs cleanly with the changes applied. If it fails, there may be bugs lurking in the code. (There may be bugs anyway, but that’s another matter.) If the test cases are known to fail, they serve no useful purpose.
test case platform date reported --------- -------- ------------- test_mmap Win ME 03-Sep-2000 Windows 2b1p2 prelease [04-Sep-2000 tim reported by Audun S. Runde mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the mmap constructor fails w/ WindowsError: [Errno 6] The handle is invalid since there are no reports of this failing on other flavors of Windows, this looks like to be an ME bug ]
Open items – Need to be resolved before 2.0 final release
Decide whether cycle-gc should be enabled by default.
Resolve compatibility issues between core xml package and the XML-SIG XML package.
Update Tools/compiler so that it is compatible with list comprehensions, import as, and any other new language features.
Improve code coverage of test suite.
Finish writing the PEPs for the features that went out with 2.0b1(! sad, but realistic – we’ll get better with practice).
Major effort to whittle the bug database down to size. I’ve (tim) seen this before: if you can keep all the open bugs fitting on one screen, people will generally keep it that way. But let it slobber over a screen for a month, & it just goes to hell (no “visible progress” indeed!).
Accepted and in progress
- Currently none left. [4-Sep-2000 guido]
Open: proposed but not accepted or rejected
- There are a number of open patches again. We need to clear these out soon.
Previously failing test cases
If you find a test bouncing between this section and the previous one, the code it’s testing is in trouble!
test case platform date reported --------- -------- ------------- test_fork1 Linux 26-Jul-2000 [28-aug-2000 fixed by cgw; solution is to create copies of lock in child process] [19-Aug-2000 tim Charles Waldman whipped up a patch to give child processes a new "global lock": http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=101226&group_id=5470 While this doesn't appear to address the symptoms we *saw*, it *does* so far appear to be fixing the failing cases anyway ] test_parser all 22-Aug-2000 test_posixpath all 22-Aug-2000 test_popen2 Win32 26-Jul-2000 [31-Aug-2000 tim This died again, but for an entirely different reason: it uses a dict to map file pointers to process handles, and calls a dict access function during popen.close(). But .close releases threads, which left the internal popen code accessing the dict without a valid thread state. The dict implementation changed so that's no longer accepted. Fixed by creating a temporary thread state in the guts of popen's close routine, and grabbing the global lock with it for the duration] [20-Aug-2000 tim changed the popen2.py _test function to use the "more" cmd when os.name == "nt". This makes test_popen2 pass under Win98SE. HOWEVER, the Win98 "more" invents a leading newline out of thin air, and I'm not sure that the other Windows flavors of "more" also do that. So, somebody please try under other Windows flavors! ] [still fails 15-Aug-2000 for me, on Win98 - tim test test_popen2 crashed -- exceptions.AssertionError : The problem is that the test uses "cat", but there is no such thing under Windows (unless you install it). So it's the test that's broken here, not (necessarily) the code. ] test_winreg Win32 26-Jul-2000 [works 15-Aug-2000 for me, on Win98 - tim] test_mmap Win32 26-Jul-2000 [believe that was fixed by Mark H.] [works 15-Aug-2000 for me, on Win98 - tim] test_longexp Win98+? 15-Aug-2000 [fails in release build, passes in release build under verbose mode but doesn't look like it should pass, passes in debug build, passes in debug build under verbose mode and looks like it should pass ] [18-Aug-2000, tim: can't reproduce, and nobody else saw it. I believe there *is* a subtle bug in regrtest.py when using -v, and I'll pursue that, but can't provoke anything wrong with test_longexp anymore; eyeballing Fred's changes didn't turn up a suspect either 19-Aug-2000, tim: the "subtle bug" in regrtest.py -v is actually a feature: -v masks *some* kinds of failures, since it doesn't compare test output with the canned output; this is what makes it say "test passed" even in some cases where the test fails without -v ] test_winreg2 Win32 26-Jul-2000 [20-Aug-2000 tim - the test has been removed from the project] [19-Aug-2000 tim This test will never work on Win98, because it's looking for a part of registry that doesn't exist under W98. The module (winreg.py) and this test case will be removed before 2.0 for other reasons, though. ] [still fails 15-Aug-2000 for me, on Win98 - tim test test_winreg2 failed -- Writing: 'Test Failed: testHives', expected: 'HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA\012' ]
Open items – completed/fixed
[4-Sep-2000 guido: Fredrik finished this on 1-Sep] * PyErr_Format - Fredrik Lundh Make this function safe from buffer overflows. [4-Sep-2000 guido: Fred has added popen2, popen3 on 28-Sep] Add popen2 support for Linux -- Fred Drake [4-Sep-2000 guido: done on 1-Sep] Deal with buffering problem with SocketServer [04-Sep-2000 tim: done; installer runs; w9xpopen not an issue] [01-Sep-2000 tim: make a prerelease available] Windows ME: Don't know anything about it. Will the installer even run? Does it need the w9xpopen hack? [04-Sep-2000 tim: done; tested on several Windows flavors now] [01-Sep-2000 tim: completed but untested except on Win98SE] Windows installer: If HKLM isn't writable, back off to HKCU (so Python can be installed on NT & 2000 without admin privileges). [01-Sep-200 tim - as Guido said, runtime code in posixmodule.c doesn't call this on NT/2000, so no need to avoid installing it everywhere. Added code to the installer *to* install it, though.] Windows installer: Install w9xpopen.exe only under Win95/98. [23-Aug-2000 jeremy - tim reports "completed recently"] Windows: Look for registry info in HKCU before HKLM - Mark Hammond. [20-Aug-2000 tim - done] Remove winreg.py and test_winreg2.py. Paul Prescod (the author) now wants to make a registry API more like the MS .NET API. Unclear whether that can be done in time for 2.0, but, regardless, if we let winreg.py out the door we'll be stuck with it forever, and not even Paul wants it anymore. [24-Aug-2000 tim+guido - done] Win98 Guido: popen is hanging on Guido, and even freezing the whole machine. Was caused by Norton Antivirus 2000 (6.10.20) on Windows 9x. Resolution: disable virus protection.
Accepted and completed
- Change meaning of x escapes - PEP 223 - Fredrik Lundh
- Add U1234678 escapes in u”” strings - Fredrik Lundh
- Support for opcode arguments >
2**16- Charles Waldman SF Patch 100893
- “import as” - Thomas Wouters Extend the ‘import’ and ‘from … import’ mechanism to enable importing a symbol as another name. (Without adding a new keyword.)
- List comprehensions - Skip Montanaro Tim Peters still needs to do PEP.
- Restore old os.path.commonprefix behavior Do we have test cases that work on all platforms?
- Tim O’Malley’s cookie module with good license
- Lockstep iteration (“zip” function) - Barry Warsaw
- SRE - Fredrik Lundh [at least I think it’s done, as of 15-Aug-2000 - tim]
- Fix xrange printing behavior - Fred Drake Remove the tp_print
handler for the xrange type; it produced a list display instead of
‘xrange(…)’. The new code produces a minimal call to xrange(),
enclosed in (
... * N) when N != 1. This makes the repr() more human readable while making it do what reprs are advertised as doing. It also makes the xrange objects obvious when working in the interactive interpreter.
- Extended print statement - Barry Warsaw PEP 214 SF Patch #100970 http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=100970&group_id=5470
- interface to poll system call - Andrew Kuchling SF Patch 100852
- Augmented assignment - Thomas Wouters Add += and family, plus Python and C hooks, and API functions.
- gettext.py module - Barry Warsaw
- Extended slicing on lists - Michael Hudson Make lists (and other builtin types) handle extended slices.
- Compression of Unicode database - Fredrik Lundh SF Patch 100899 At least for 2.0b1. May be included in 2.0 as a bug fix.
- Range literals - Thomas Wouters SF Patch 100902 We ended up having a lot of doubt about the proposal.
- Eliminated SET_LINENO opcode - Vladimir Marangozov Small
optimization achieved by using the code object’s lnotab instead of
the SET_LINENO instruction. Uses code rewriting technique (that
Guido’s frowns on) to support debugger, which uses SET_LINENO.
http://starship.python.net/~vlad/lineno/ for (working at the time) patches
Discussions on python-dev:
- http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-April/subject.html Subject: “Why do we need Traceback Objects?”
- test harness for C code - Trent Mick
- ‘indexing-for’ - Thomas Wouters Special syntax to give Python code access to the loop-counter in ‘for’ loops. (Without adding a new keyword.)
Last modified: 2022-01-21 11:03:51 GMT