PEP 496 – Environment Markers
- PEP
- 496
- Title
- Environment Markers
- Author
- James Polley <jp at jamezpolley.com>
- BDFL-Delegate
- Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>
- Status
- Rejected
- Type
- Informational
- Created
- 03-Jul-2015
PEP Status
After this PEP was initially drafted, PEP 508 was developed and submitted to fully specify the dependency declaration syntax, including environment markers. As a result, this PEP ended up being rejected in favour of the more comprehensive PEP 508.
Abstract
An environment marker describes a condition about the current execution environment. They are used to indicate when certain dependencies are only required in particular environments, and to indicate supported platforms for distributions with additional constraints beyond the availability of a Python runtime.
Environment markers were first specified in PEP 345. PEP 426 (which would replace PEP 345) proposed extensions to the markers. When 2.7.10 was released, even these extensions became insufficient due to their reliance on simple lexical comparisons, and thus this PEP has been born.
Rationale
Many Python packages are written with portability in mind.
For many packages this means they aim to support a wide range of
Python releases. If they depend on libraries such as argparse
-
which started as external libraries, but later got incorporated into
core - specifying a single set of requirements is difficult, as the
set of required packages differs depending on the version of Python in
use.
For other packages, designing for portability means supporting
multiple operating systems. However, the significant differences
between them may mean that particular dependencies are only needed on
particular platforms (relying on pywin32
only on Windows, for
example)”
Environment Markers attempt to provide more flexibility in a list of requirements by allowing the developer to list requirements that are specific to a particular environment.
Examples
Here are some examples of such markers inside a requirements.txt:
pywin32 >=1.0 ; sys_platform == 'win32'
unittest2 >=2.0,<3.0 ; python_version == '2.4' or python_version == '2.5'
backports.ssl_match_hostname >= 3.4 ; python_version < '2.7.9' or (python_version >= '3.0' and python_version < '3.4')
And here’s an example of some conditional metadata included in setup.py for a distribution that requires PyWin32 both at runtime and buildtime when using Windows:
setup(
install_requires=["pywin32 > 1.0 : sys.platform == 'win32'"],
setup_requires=["pywin32 > 1.0 : sys.platform == 'win32'"]
)
Micro-language
The micro-language behind this is as follows. It compares:
- strings with the
==
andin
operators (and their opposites) - version numbers with the
<
,<=
,>=
, and<
operators in addition to those supported for strings
The usual boolean operators and
and or
can be used to combine
expressions, and parentheses are supported for grouping.
The pseudo-grammar is
MARKER: EXPR [(and|or) EXPR]*
EXPR: ("(" MARKER ")") | (STREXPR|VEREXPR)
STREXPR: STRING [STRCMPOP STREXPR]
STRCMPOP: ==|!=|in|not in
VEREXPR: VERSION [VERCMPOP VEREXPR]
VERCMPOP: (==|!=|<|>|<=|>=)
SUBEXPR
is either a Python string (such as 'win32'
) or one of
the Strings
marker variables listed below.
VEREXPR
is a PEP 440 version identifier, or one of the
Version number
marker variables listed below. Comparisons between
version numbers are done using PEP 440 semantics.
Strings
os_name
:os.name
sys_platform
:sys.platform
platform_release
:platform.release()
implementation_name
:sys.implementation.name
platform_machine
:platform.machine()
platform_python_implementation
:platform.python_implementation()
If a particular string value is not available (such as sys.implementation.name
in versions of Python prior to 3.3), the corresponding marker
variable MUST be considered equivalent to the empty string.
If a particular version number value is not available (such as
sys.implementation.version
in versions of Python prior to 3.3) the
corresponding marker variable MUST be considered equivalent to 0
Version numbers
python_version
:platform.python_version()[:3]
python_full_version
: see definition belowplatform_version
:platform.version()
implementation_version
: see definition below
The python_full_version
and implementation_version
marker variables
are derived from sys.version_info
and sys.implementation.version
respectively, in accordance with the following algorithm:
def format_full_version(info):
version = '{0.major}.{0.minor}.{0.micro}'.format(info)
kind = info.releaselevel
if kind != 'final':
version += kind[0] + str(info.serial)
return version
python_full_version = format_full_version(sys.version_info)
implementation_version = format_full_version(sys.implementation.version)
python_full_version
will typically correspond to sys.version.split()[0]
.
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Source: https://github.com/python-discord/peps/blob/main/pep-0496.txt
Last modified: 2022-01-21 11:03:51 GMT